Word Weavers Online - Home  
Welcome      Login   
  Home Leadership Team   Leadership Team Membership   Membership Calendar   Calendar Writing Tips   Writing Tips Photo Galleries   Photo Galleries Contact Us   Contact Us
   
   



________________
Add this to your site
   
 

General


A Complete Guide to Writing for Publication by Susan Titus Osborn

Christian Writers' Market Guide by Sally Stuart

Stein on Writing by Sol Stein

The Writers' Market by Writers Digest Books

Writing for the Soul by Jerry B. Jenkins


 
 

Nonfiction


Writer's Digest Handbook of Magazine Article Writing

Sally Stuart's Guide to Getting Published

Just Write
by Susan Titus Osborne

Woe is I by Patricia O'Conner

On Writing Well by William Zinsser

Christian Writer's Manual of Style by Robert Hudson

The Elements of Style by Strunk and White
 
   
 

Fiction


Characters, Emotions & Viewpoint by Nancy Kess

Dialogue by Gloria Kempton

Description & Setting by Ron Rozelle

Plot and Structure by James Scott Bell

Revision & Self-Editing by James Scott Bell

Self-Editing for Fiction Writers by Renni Browne and Dave King

The Complete Handbook of Novel Writing from Writers Digest

The Complete Idiot's Guide to Writing Christian Fiction by Ron Benrey


 
 

Children


The Children's Writers and Illustrators Market by Writers Digest Books

The Children's Writer's Word Book by Alijandra Mogilner
 
   
The Word Weasel
 

John Leatherman

August 2010: Don’t Get Possessive With Your Plurals

 

In the last post I offered you a challenge: to type the word ’til in MS Word . . . with a properly curving apostrophe. If you tried it, you probably typed til (note the mark is actually an upside-down apostrophe).

This happens because the apostrophe key actually represents three different characters: apostrophe, left single quote, and right single quote. In some fonts, they all look the same: a tapered vertical bar, like a half-size exclamation point without the point. But in the preferred Times New Roman and Arial, Word wants the apostrophe and right quote [’] to curve up and the left quote [‘] to curve down.

So to figure out which of the three characters you meant to type, Word kind of has to guess. And most of the time it’s right. Because usually when that key—let’s call it apoquote—comes between a space and an alphanumeric key, you’re starting a quote:

 

“A quote within a quote uses single quote marks. It isnt hard to remember.”

 

So the apoquote should be the down-curving left quote.

            For letter-apoquote-letter, the apoquote must be an apostrophe, and for letter-apoquote-space, it’s probably a right quote. (Of course, it could be an apostrophe too, but the characters are the same.)

            So the leading apostrophe as in ’til is one of those rare cases where Bill Gates can’t read your mind. It’s space-apoquote-letter, which looks like the start of a quote.

            So, how do you type it right?

 

  1. Type apoquote-apoquote-t-i-s: ‘’til
  2. See how you’ve got left-quote, right-quote just before the word? Stick your cursor in between those two characters. ‘|’til
  3. Then just backspace, and the offending character is gone. ’til

             

There! You’ve outsmarted the richest man in the world. Don’t you feel powerful?

But you can’t completely outsmart the apostrophe without an understanding of when not to use it. When making a noun plural, you never use an apostrophe. Never, ever, ever (almost!*).

You probably knew that. It makes sense theoretically. A possessive is an adjective, and a plural is a noun. There should be no confusion.

But listen to your subconscious as you read the italics in the following (correctly punctuated) sentence:

 

                        The Smiths lived in that house during the 1990s.

 

            You can probably hear yourself thinking it: That no look right! Must . . . use . . . apostrophes . . .

            Why should these words confound us? Both words are clearly plural nouns (the subject and object of a preposition). Why do we want to apostrophize the s?

            For the Smiths (that is, the group of people named Smith), it may be our convention of using the phrase “the Smiths’ ” as shorthand for, “the Smiths’ house” (that is, the house belonging to the group of people named Smith). Because “house” is understood, the possessive effectively acts as a noun:

 

                        The Smiths flooded during 1990’s hurricane.

 

            This sentence also demonstrates the proper use of “1990’s”—something belonging 1990—as distinguished from the 1990s (that is, all the years that start with nineteen-ninety). Why do we want to use “1990’s” to represent everything from the fall of Communism to the Y2K scare?

That may be because we see the shocking sight of a numeral 0 next to a letter s. We somehow want to separate them with an apostrophe.

Likewise for pluralized abbreviations and acronyms. Listen to your subconscious scream as you read the following:

 

                        A wall of HDTVs showed commercials for new PCs that act as ATMs.

 

            Again, this sentence is correctly punctuated. A lower-case s does not need any separation from a string of capital letters or digits because they are different classes of characters.

And that brings us to the aforementioned asterisk. Consider the following:

 

            The name Isaiah contains two is and two as.

 

In this case, your subconscious is right; without separation, the plurals look like the words is and as. So the only time you should use an apostrophe s to make a plural is with a letter of the alphabet:

 

            The name Isaiah contains two i’s and two a’s.

 

Perhaps another good reason for this rule is that it avoids unintentionally suggestive sentences like, “My report card was all Bs.”

 

 

  

John Leatherman

 
Word Weasel Archives
2009-07: Wrangling the Dangling Part I: Dangling Participles 2009-07: Wrangling the Dangling Part I: Dangling Participles
2009-08: Wrangling the Dangling Part II: Recognizing and correcting a dangling participle 2009-08: Wrangling the Dangling Part II: Recognizing and correcting a dangling participle
2009-09: Participial Daze: More on Participial Phrases 2009-09: Participial Daze: More on Participial Phrases
2009-10: Absolute Power: Using Absolute Phrases for Sentence Variety 2009-10: Absolute Power: Using Absolute Phrases for Sentence Variety
2009-11: Passive Resistance: What is Passive Voice? 2009-11: Passive Resistance: What is Passive Voice?
2009-12: Passive Aggression: Changing Passive to Active 2009-12: Passive Aggression: Changing Passive to Active
2010-01: Passive Acceptance: When Passive is Preferable 2010-01: Passive Acceptance: When Passive is Preferable
2010-02: Passive Is: What is Passive Writing? 2010-02: Passive Is: What is Passive Writing?
2010-03: Theres--They're There: Eliminating Was and Were 2010-03: Theres--They're There: Eliminating Was and Were
2010-04: That WAS was Okay: When "was" is acceptable 2010-04: That WAS was Okay: When "was" is acceptable
2010-05: Grammar Disagrees with Me: Subject-verb agreement 2010-05: Grammar Disagrees with Me: Subject-verb agreement
2010-06: What the Spell(check): Why NOT to Trust Spellcheck 2010-06: What the Spell(check): Why NOT to Trust Spellcheck
2010-07: Apostrophic Proportions: The Apostrophe 2010-07: Apostrophic Proportions: The Apostrophe
2010-08: Don't Get Possessive: Tricky Plurals 2010-08: Don't Get Possessive: Tricky Plurals
  
Word Weasel Feedback
 

Still confused? Curious about another grammar issue? Seeking vengeance?

Click here to e-mail your questions, comments, and suggestions. Or shout really loud.

 

Powered by IntelliGuest® GroupWebs - v5.1.0 s BETA -  © 2001-2008 Group Seven Technology, Inc.  -  Credits & Disclaimers  - 
IntelliGuest® is a registered trademark of Group Seven Technology, Inc.